Layla Zulfa
Ethereum’s core development landscape continues to evolve at a rapid pace, with the network’s upcoming upgrades, Glamsterdam and Hegotá, marking significant milestones in its journey towards enhanced scalability, security, and decentralization. While the rapid succession of previous upgrades like Dencun (which included the highly anticipated proto-danksharding, significantly reducing Layer 2 transaction costs) and the initial excitement surrounding the potential quick follow-up of Glamsterdam, the current phase of development is proving more complex than initially anticipated. Core developers are grappling with intricate technical challenges, particularly with the enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (ePBS) within Glamsterdam, leading to a measured but persistent march forward. Concurrently, the subsequent Hegotá upgrade is beginning to take shape, with its major feature, FOCIL, already selected, and a strong commitment to addressing Account Abstraction (AA) as a critical non-headliner component.
Glamsterdam: Navigating the Complexities of Core Protocol Evolution
The Glamsterdam upgrade (EIP-7773), the immediate successor to the Dencun upgrade, is currently in its intensive implementation phase. The full scope of features slated for this upgrade, encompassing both "Scheduled for Inclusion" (SFI) and "Considered for Inclusion" (CFI) proposals, is meticulously tracked on platforms like Forkcast. SFI features are those with a high degree of certainty for inclusion, having passed rigorous initial vetting and demonstrated feasibility. CFI features, while highly probable, remain contingent on successful implementation, compatibility with SFI features, and their overall complexity. The definitions and criteria for these inclusion stages are themselves subject to ongoing refinement, reflecting the dynamic nature of blockchain protocol development.
A cornerstone of the Glamsterdam upgrade is the introduction of several gas repricings. These adjustments are not merely arbitrary fee changes but are strategic recalibrations aimed at optimizing network resource allocation, improving transaction predictability, and laying the groundwork for safely increasing the network’s overall throughput. These repricings are largely being bundled together, signifying a holistic approach to gas economics. Beyond these adjustments, EIP-7954, which proposes an increase to the maximum contract size, has garnered significant attention and advocacy from ecosystem developers. This enhancement is crucial for enabling more complex smart contracts and applications to be deployed on the Ethereum mainnet, addressing a long-standing limitation that often forces developers to split functionalities across multiple smaller contracts or resort to intricate optimization techniques. The strong community sentiment around EIP-7954 suggests its high prioritization within the Glamsterdam development roadmap.
However, the most substantial technical hurdle currently facing Glamsterdam is the implementation of enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (ePBS). This mechanism represents a profound architectural shift in how blocks are constructed and validated on the Ethereum network. Currently, block production often involves a "builder" (often a specialized entity or relay) creating a block and then a "proposer" (a validator) signing and submitting it. This separation primarily operates outside the core protocol, leading to concerns around Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) centralization and potential censorship. ePBS aims to bring this separation into the consensus protocol itself, creating a more robust, transparent, and decentralized system.
The complexity arises because ePBS fundamentally alters the block production process, requiring the protocol to account for two distinct parties—the proposer and the builder—acting in sequence. This introduces new challenges related to coordination, dispute resolution, and handling scenarios where one party might fail or act maliciously. Every layer of the Ethereum stack, from the execution clients to the consensus clients, must be re-engineered to reason about "partial blocks" and the intricate two-party interaction. This architectural overhaul touches virtually every component of the network, making it an exceptionally intricate undertaking.
On the execution layer, Block-level Access Lists (BALs), outlined in EIP-7928, represent another significant innovation. BALs are a fundamental rethinking of how gas is consumed and how state access is managed within transactions. By providing a mechanism for transactions to declare the parts of the state they intend to access, BALs can potentially enable more efficient block processing and more accurate gas estimation, contributing to a better user experience and network performance. The development of BALs is progressing through dedicated devnets, with developers encountering and systematically addressing the expectedly difficult problems inherent in such a foundational change.
Navigating the Glamsterdam Development Pipeline
The development process for an upgrade of Glamsterdam’s magnitude is a multi-stage, iterative endeavor. Developers are currently focused on stabilizing the dedicated ePBS devnets, which are crucial for stress-testing the new consensus mechanisms in isolation. Following the stabilization of these specialized devnets, the ambition is to launch the first generalized Glamsterdam devnet in the coming weeks. This generalized devnet will begin to integrate a broader set of features, moving beyond just ePBS to include gas repricings, EIP-7954, BALs, and other non-headliner features.
The strategy involves iterating through several such generalized devnets, progressively adding more components and refining their interactions. This rigorous testing phase is designed to uncover bugs, identify performance bottlenecks, and ensure seamless compatibility between all proposed changes. Once a stable devnet, encompassing all intended features, is achieved, client teams will proceed to cut official client releases. These releases will then undergo final security reviews, a critical step to identify and mitigate any potential vulnerabilities introduced by the new code. Only after these comprehensive security audits are completed and the testnets prove stable and reliable will the Ethereum Foundation and core developers announce the mainnet fork date, signaling the readiness for the upgrade to go live for all users.
Hegotá: Charting the Course for Future Enhancements
Looking beyond Glamsterdam, the Hegotá upgrade is already taking shape, with its major feature selection process concluded. FOCIL (EIP-7805) has been chosen as the consensus layer headliner for Hegotá. While details of FOCIL are still emerging, its selection indicates a continued focus on core protocol improvements that enhance the network’s foundational capabilities, potentially related to validator efficiency or overall consensus security.
A particularly animated discussion during the Hegotá feature selection revolved around Account Abstraction (AA). AA is a highly anticipated feature designed to significantly improve user experience on Ethereum by allowing smart contracts to function as user accounts. This would enable capabilities like social recovery, batch transactions, and flexible signature schemes, moving away from the rigid Externally Owned Accounts (EOAs) and towards more programmable and user-friendly "smart wallets." EIP-8141, a specific proposal for "Frame transactions" aimed at implementing AA, faced considerable debate within the execution layer development community. While the consensus on a specific implementation choice proved elusive in the short term, the overwhelming interest and recognized importance of AA led to EIP-8141 being moved to "Considered for Inclusion" (CFI) status as a non-headliner. This signifies a firm commitment from core developers to continue working on an Account Abstraction proposal that can garner broader support and consensus among client developers and the wider community, ensuring its eventual integration into the protocol.
Another area of increasing interest, though without a standalone proposal yet, is quantum resistance. As quantum computing capabilities advance, there is a growing awareness of the long-term threat they pose to current cryptographic primitives, including those underpinning blockchain security. While some Account Abstraction proposals have incidentally included quantum resistance as part of a broader package, the community is actively exploring dedicated solutions to future-proof Ethereum against potential quantum attacks. This forward-looking approach underscores Ethereum’s commitment to long-term security and resilience.
The process for proposing non-headlining features for Hegotá commenced on April 9th, allowing any interested party to submit an EIP by pulling it into the "Proposed for Inclusion" section of the upgrade’s meta EIP. The closing date for these submissions will be announced at least two weeks in advance, providing ample time for community participation. The most current information regarding Hegotá’s process and timeline is maintained on its dedicated Forkcast page. It is important to note that the ultimate timing of the Hegotá upgrade remains highly dependent on the progress and successful deployment of Glamsterdam in the coming months.
Enhancing Network Throughput: The Gas Limit Evolution
A continuous effort within Ethereum’s development is the ongoing testing of increased gas limits on devnets. The gas limit dictates the maximum amount of computational work that can be included in a single block, directly influencing the network’s transaction processing capacity. The current target for the baseline gas limit in Glamsterdam is 60 million units, a significant increase that would allow for more transactions and more complex operations per block. However, testing is being conducted at even higher limits, far exceeding 60 million, to thoroughly understand the implications of such increases on network performance, state bloat, and decentralization. These tests aim to identify necessary optimizations and potential vulnerabilities before any limits are officially raised on the mainnet. Much of the gas repricing work being implemented in Glamsterdam is directly designed to enable these higher gas limits safely, ensuring that the network can handle increased throughput without compromising stability or security.
Empowering Community Contributions: The EIP Champion’s Handbook
Recognizing the vital role of community contributions in Ethereum’s decentralized development model, new resources have been published on the Protocol Support team website. The EIP Champions Handbook is a comprehensive guide designed to assist authors and advocates in championing their feature proposals effectively. It outlines the intricate process of developing, submitting, and garnering stakeholder feedback for an Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP). This handbook serves as an invaluable tool for anyone interested in contributing a feature to an Ethereum upgrade, streamlining the path from an initial idea to a potential mainnet inclusion.
Broader Strategic Vision: The Strawmap’s Influence
Beyond the specific technical details of each upgrade, the broader strategic direction of Ethereum development is increasingly informed by community-driven initiatives. The "strawmap," a non-official but widely recognized roadmap published this year, has reignited enthusiasm for having a guiding framework. While not a rigid mandate, the strawmap serves as a beneficial tool in helping the community converge on priorities and inform feature choices during the upgrade process. It offers a high-level vision that complements the granular work of EIPs and upgrade planning, fostering greater alignment and understanding across the diverse Ethereum ecosystem.
Expert Perspectives and Forward Outlook
The current pace of Glamsterdam’s development, described as "slow but steady" and "trickier than anticipated," underscores the inherent complexity of evolving a global, decentralized network like Ethereum. While the initial expectation for a quick follow-up to Dencun might have been tempered, core developers appear to be approaching these challenges with characteristic dedication and pragmatism. The difficulty in implementing ePBS, a change that fundamentally reshapes block production, highlights the ambitious nature of Ethereum’s roadmap towards enhanced decentralization and MEV mitigation.
Experts suggest that while delays can be frustrating for users and application developers eager for new functionalities, a thorough and cautious approach to protocol upgrades is paramount. Rushing complex changes could introduce unforeseen vulnerabilities or instability, which would have far-reaching negative consequences for the entire ecosystem. The commitment to rigorous testing through multiple devnets and comprehensive security reviews reflects a mature and responsible development philosophy.
The singular headliner chosen for Hegotá, FOCIL, combined with the commitment to integrate Account Abstraction as a non-headliner, suggests a strategic balancing act. Should Glamsterdam’s complex features be successfully integrated and stabilized, Hegotá could potentially follow in a shorter timeframe, especially if the non-headliner process for Account Abstraction leads to a broadly supported implementation. The community’s strong desire for Account Abstraction means that a well-defined proposal, even if initially a non-headliner, could still be promoted to headliner status in a future iteration, reflecting its critical importance for mass adoption and user experience.
The ongoing efforts to increase the gas limit and refine gas repricing mechanisms are crucial for Ethereum’s long-term scalability. As the network continues to attract more users and applications, its ability to process a higher volume of transactions efficiently and affordably will be a key differentiator. The exploration of quantum resistance, even in its nascent stages, demonstrates a proactive stance on future-proofing the network against emerging technological threats, reinforcing Ethereum’s commitment to enduring security.
In conclusion, Ethereum’s development trajectory remains robust, albeit with the expected challenges of pioneering advanced blockchain technology. The current efforts on Glamsterdam and the foundational planning for Hegotá signify a continuous push towards a more scalable, secure, and user-friendly network. The collaborative nature of the development process, bolstered by initiatives like the EIP Champions Handbook and the guiding influence of the strawmap, ensures that Ethereum’s evolution is a collective endeavor, driven by innovation and a shared vision for the future of decentralized computing.
Relevant ACD Calls:
[ January 21st – April 9th ]
ACDT: 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67
ACDC: 176, 175, 174, 173
ACDE: 234, 233, 232, 231, 230, 229
